The voidness of our holodeck world

Okay, here is an critical question. It pertains to those new to Buddhism as well as even the little old timers. How do they understand the following thoroughfare below which is taken from the Heart Sutra?

Here, Sariputra, form is voidness as well as the very voidness is form; voidness does not differ from form, form does not differ from voidness; whatever is form, which is voidness, whatever is voidness, which is form, the same is true of feelings, perceptions, impulses as well as consciousness.

Ding dong! Time is up. They learn this sold voidness in possibly one of 3 ways: 1) voidness is essentially detached to the 5 skandhas begining with form as well as finale with consciousness; 2) voidness negates things; 3) voidness is something determinate. But all which this tells us is which they have reified voidness. In plain English, the abstract tenure void has been done in to the being in the own right. But this is wrong.

The voidness of the 5 skandhas mentioned in the Heart Sutra, namely, the voidness of form, feelings, perceptions, impulses as well as consciousness, according to Vimalamitras commentary (Arya-Prajnaparamita-tika), is likened to the voidness of the city of gandharvas together with the voidness of the dream, the moon in the water, etc. (Lancaster, Prajnaparamita as well as Related Systems (1977), p. 142). Essentially, this equates to which voidness stands for illusion.

Form, the first skandha, is then an apparition as are the rest of the skandhas. Turning to the older Pali canon form is, by the Buddha, likened to foam, feeling to the bubble, notice to the mirage, impulses to the vale plantain trunk, as well as alertness to the magicians apparition (S. iii. 142). Judging from this, not the singular skandha is alternative than insubstantial. It is by these skandha which the world comes in to view, the world which is like the holodeck simulation to make use of the great image from the television series Star Trek.